What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Work Without a Permit. The hearing date is October 2, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 21, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39556885N
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 21, 2026; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A PROPOSED 4-STORY NB, I OBSERVED AN ERECTED CONSTRUCTION FENCE WITH AN EXPIRED PERMIT. PERMIT WAS ISSUED ON 10/29/2025 AND EXPIRED ON 06/30/2026. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A VALID PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 2L1 — 28-105.1 FAILURE TO OBTAIN A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATIO
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39556886P
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 21, 2026; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED BARRIERS IN ROADWAY EXP1 WITHOUT AN ACTIVE DOT PERMIT AUTHORIZING PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON THE STREET. THIS CONDITION IS CONTRARY TO BC 3307.2.1. OBTAIN REQUIR
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39556887R
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 21, 2026; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OF A PROPOSED 4-STORY NEW BUILDING, OBSERVED WORKERS GOING IN AND OUT. WORKERS ON SITE DENIED ACCESS TO INSPECT THE PREMISES, PREVENTING INSPECTION OF ONGOING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AC
Cited provision(s): 2A7 — 28-116.1 PERMIT HOLDER FAIL TO PROVIDE ACCESS AND/OR EXPOSE WORK ON ACTIVE SITE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review