What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses. The hearing date is October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 8, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557688Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION FENCE PANELS WERE LOOSE, FALLING AND NOT ENCLOSING SITE AS REQUIRE BY CODE. CREATING AN UNSAFE DISLODGING AND ACCESSIBLE CONDITION TO THE PUBLIC WHERE FALL HAZA
Cited provision(s): 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557687R
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED PROPOSED 1STORY NB ACTIVE SITE. AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED WORKERS CONDUCTING PLUMBING/ LAYOUT OPERATIONS. UPON REQUEST OF SITE SAFETY PLAN NO SSP WAS PROVIDED FOR THE JOB / WORK BEING CONDUCTED
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review