What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 7 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; 2 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Plumbing / Gas. The hearing dates are October 16, 2026, October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 10, 2026, August 14, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557717Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, SITE SAFETY COORDINATOR LIC. NO. 003040 WAS DESIGNATED ON THE PW2 FOR TWO SEPARATE MAJOR BUILDING SITES: 112 EAST 167TH STREET, PERMIT NO. X01255412, AND 120 EAST 167TH STREET, PERMIT NO.
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39557944Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 14, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 12-STORY NEW BUILDING, MULTIPLE UNSAFE CONDITIONS WERE OBSERVED, INCLUDING MISSING GUARDRAILS AND OVERHEAD PROTECTION, NO HOIST/ELEVATOR, STANDPIPE NOT IN READINESS, AND PROPANE TANK STORAGE WITHOUT AN FDNY PER
Cited provision(s): 2G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557947Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 14, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT INSPECTION OF A 12-STORY BUILDING FARMWORK AT THE 12TH-FLOOR LEVEL, NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION OR CONTROLLED ACCESS ZONE WAS PROVIDED AT EXP# 2 ADJACENT PROPERTY ACTIVE JOB SITE IN FOUNDATION PHASE. HAZARD TO PU
Cited provision(s): 1P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39557945K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 14, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3303.12, 12-STORY BUILDING FORMING AT THE 12TH FLOOR, NO HOIST OR ELEVATOR WAS INSTALLED OR IN READINESS. THIS CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOR THE PUBLIC, PROPERTY, AND FDNY EMERGENCY ACCESS. STOP ALL WORK
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 39557948X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 14, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3303.8 12-STORY BUILDING, THE STANDPIPE SYSTEM WAS NOT IN READINESS AND WAS OBSERVED BELOW 75 FEET WHILE WORK WAS AT THE 12TH FLOOR. THIS CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOR PUBLIC, PROPERTY, AND FDNY EMERGENC
Cited provision(s): 1C3 — BC 3303.8.1 FAIL TO PROVIDE STANDPIPE/AIR PRESSURIZED ALARM FOR STANDPIPE SYSTEM
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557946M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 14, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT INSPECTION OF A 12-STORY NEW BUILDING, INADEQUATE GUARDRAILS WERE OBSERVED FROM THE 11TH TO 12TH FLOORS, WITH SECTIONS MISSING AT THE 12TH FLOOR, EXP# 2 & 4. THIS CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITION. STOP ALL WORK
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557949H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 14, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3301.1.2 AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 12-STORY BUILDING, 6 PROPANE TANK WAS OBSERVED ON SITE. UPON REQUEST, THE FDNY PERMIT WAS FOUND EXPIRED SINCE 07/27/2026. THIS CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITION TO THE PUB
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 7 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review