What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses. The hearing dates are October 16, 2026, October 2, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 5, 2026, July 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39556821Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 20, 2026; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED DESIGNATED SITE SAFETY COORDINATOR #3483 WAS ALSO DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION SUPER ON SEPARATE JOB SITE 666 E 170TH STREET. FAILURE TO COMPLY CREATES CONFLICTING SAFETY CONDITIONS
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557549Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED PROPOSED 7 STORY NB ACTIVE JOB SITE AT DECKING STAGE AT GROUND FLOOR. AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED MULTIPLE UNCAPPED REBAR WHICH POSES IMPALEMENT HAZARDS. BC 3301.2PROVIDE/MAINTAIN SAFETY OF EXPOSE
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557548R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED PROPOSED 7 STORY NB ACTIVE JOB SITE AT DECKING STAGE AT GROUND FLOOR. AT TIME OF INSPECTION SITE FAILED TO PROVIDE APPROVED PLANS FOR SCOPE OF WORK AT TIME OF INSPECTION.
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review