What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Site Safety / Safeguarding; Crane / Hoist / Derricks. The hearing dates are October 16, 2026, October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 26, 2026, August 4, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 35729962P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO INSTITUTE SAFETY EQUIP MEASURES OR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION "IMPROPER GUARDRAIL". AS NOTED: AT TIME OF INSPECTION AT AN ACTIVE JOBSITE OF A PROPOSED 6 STORY BUILDING ALREADY AT THE 3RD FLOOR LEVEL. OBS
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39201886M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 26, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: MOBILE CRANE CN#236/26 CD#5209 WAS ERECTED, BUT RESPONDENT FAILED TO NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF ARRIVAL. ARIVAL NOTIFICATION WAS MADE AFTER I ARRIVED ON SITE., PROPERLY NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT; MAKE PROPER NOTIFICA
Cited provision(s): 2J9 — 1 RCNY 3319-01(C)(5) EQUIPMENT USER FAILED TO MAKE THE PROPER NOTIFICATION TO THE DEPARTMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review