What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing dates are October 22, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 19, 2025, July 22, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556929X
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 5 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED IN PLACE AT EXPOSURE # 1 AND 2, UPON REVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT RECORDS IT REVEAL THAT THE SIDEWALK SHED PERMIT IS NOT YET ISSUED, FAIL
Cited provision(s): 2P8
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556932R
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 5 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED IN PLACE AT EXPOSURE # 1 AND 2, WITH MISSING BOLT COVERS, ROTTEN MUDSILLS AND MISSING INFORMATION PANEL. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINT
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35719090H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 19, 2025; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COMMISSIONER'S ORDER. VIOLATION #061325PI30201SB AND CONTROL #341560 DATED 06/13/25. NO COMPLIANCE ON FILE FOR A CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN. REMEDY: COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER AND/O
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review