What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Site Safety / Safeguarding; Other Building / Code Compliance; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Sign / Awning / Advertising. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 4, 2026, July 22, 2026, June 25, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39556934K
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, MONOKOTE FIREPROOFING SPRAY OPERATIONS WERE CONDUCTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE CONTAINMENT. MONOKOTE DEBRIS ORIGINATING FROM THE SITE WAS OBSERVED AT 53 BOERUM PLACE. FAILURE TO CONTAIN AIRBORNE
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39555895M
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 25, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: WORKER CUT HAND WHILE USING REBAR BENDING MACHINE FOR REBAR OPERATION, ON A 17 STORY NB SITE. PERMIT HOLDER JOB# B00939362-I1-GC, FAILED TO SUBMIT REPORT WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS OF REQUIRED 16 ITEMS TO CODE 28-1
Cited provision(s): 1M7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557492R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, WHILE RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT INVOLVING A WORKER WHO SLIPPED AND FELL DURING STRIPPING OPERATIONS AT THE ELEVATOR SHAFT ON THE 14TH FLOOR, SCAFFOLD PLATFORMS WERE NOT FULLY PLANKED, NO
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sign / Awning / Advertising — Summons 39557493Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, MAKESHIFT TEMPORARY PLATFORMS WERE OBSERVED ON STAIRCASES AT THE 17TH FLOOR. UPON REQUEST FOR DESIGN DRAWINGS, NONE WERE PROVIDED, CONTRARY TO BC 3301.6.5. STOP USE OF THE TEMPORARY PLATF
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Sign-related charges usually require confirming zoning/permit requirements, dimensions, illumination and placement, followed by permit/legalization or removal/modification.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the sign/awning exempt from a permit or already covered by an approved filing?
- Were the dimensions/location described by the inspector accurate?
- Was the sign removed or modified before the summons date or hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Sign permit / zoning documents
- Measured photographs and drawings
- Removal or modification invoice
- Prior approvals and storefront plans
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review