What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 7 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 4 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Demolition; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing date is October 14, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Demolition — Summons 39557652R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE SITE FAILED TO PROVIDE OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR BOTH ADJOINING PROPERTIES @ EXP. 2&4 (3307.4.7)WORKING ZONES RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION OF A BUILDING S
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557657X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE SITE FAILED BY STORING LARGE AMOUNT OF MATERIAL @ UNENCLOSED PREMETERS( 3303.4.7) STORAGE NEAR SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, AND PATHWAYS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH DOT PERMITS &
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557640J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE SITE WITHOUT CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT. THE OWNER FAILED TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT(3301.13.3)CS SHALL CARRY OUT ALL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES APPOIN
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557648Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE SITE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM IT'S DUTIES (BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13)UPON REQUEST CS WAS NOT PERSENT@TIME OF INSPECTION, NO DESIGNATED
Cited provision(s): 2G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557655M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED SITE FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION FENCE (BC 3307.7) @ EXP. 1 VIEWING PANEL COVERED & NO BLOCKAGE MATERIAL WAS PROVIDED(3307.7.3) VIEWING PANELS NON-FRANGIBLE ACRYLIC PAN
Cited provision(s): 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557651P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE SITE FAILED TO PROVIDE APPROVE DOCUMENTS ON SITE(BC 3301.7-2014 CODE) UNPON REQUEST SITE FAILED TO PROVIDE SITE SAFETY PLANS, STRUCTURAL STEEL PLANS,COLD FORM STEEL
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557656Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE SITE FAILED TO PROVIDE PROPER HOUSEKEEPING FOR OVERLOADED DEBRIS THROUGHOUT THE SITE (BC 3303.4 & 27-1018) SITE FAILED BY NEGLECTING ITS RESPONSIBITIES BY INSURING T
Cited provision(s): 212 — BC 3303.4,27-1018 FAIL TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HSEKEEPING PER SECTIONS REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 7 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review