What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Other Building / Code Compliance; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Work Without a Permit. The hearing date is October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are September 5, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39544513Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 5, 2025; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE, I OBSERVED MISSING OVERHEAD PROTECTION AT EXPOSURE#3 OF JOBSITE INCLUDING AT THE REAR YARD OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERHEAD PROTECTION CREA
Cited provision(s): 1P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39544514X
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 5, 2025; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTE AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION PROPOSE MIXED USED 4 STORY BUILDING WITH RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITY, I OBSERVED THERE WERE NO DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT ONSITE AS REQUIRED.STOP ALL CONSTRUCTI
Cited provision(s): 1G6 — BC 3301.13.3 FAILURE TO DESIGNATE AND/OR HAVE A CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39544515H
CLASS - 2 · Issued September 5, 2025; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE, I OBSERVED SHORING INSTALLED AT THE CELLAR UP TO THE 2ND FLOOR LEVEL NOT CONFORMED TO APPROVED PLANS ON SITE, FAILURE TO CONFORM TO APPROVED PLANS CREATES HAZ
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review