What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Work Without a Permit summonses; Failure to Maintain. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 21, 2026, July 31, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39196897Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 21, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED 3 MEZZANINE LEVELS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A 1-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND BEING USED FOR STORAGE AND WORKERS' LOCKER ROOM. DOB RECORDS INDICATE NO PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39196896M
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 21, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FTM: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED AT GROUND FLOOR LEVEL, WOODEN BEAM SUPPORTING FLOOR FRAMING EXHIBITS ADVANCED ROT AND DETERIORATION AT BEARING POST. MEZZANINE AREA USED AS WORKERS LOCKER ROOM, CEILING
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39198704H
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 31, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED REAR PARTY WALL IN BETWEEN 1611 PACIFIC STREET AND 1616 ATLANTIC AVE HAS BEEN REMOVED WITH NEW STEEL I AM SPENDING THE WIDTH OF WALL. THE REAR SECTION OF HAS BEEN EXTENDED ONTO REAR YARD OF 1609 PACIFI
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39198705J
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 31, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED THROUGHOUT COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH A PERMIT. NO PERMIT ON RECORD FOR THIS WORK, OBTAIN PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review