What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Construction Fence; Work Without a Permit. The hearing date is October 28, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 19, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Construction Fence — Summons 39558112K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED THE CONSTRUCTION FENCE ENCROACHING ONTO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK AT EXPOSURES 1 AND 4. AFTER REVIEW OF DOT RECORDS WAS DETERMINED THAT THE REQUIRED DOT PERMIT HAD NOT BEEN OBTAINED, C
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Construction-fence charges generally require bringing the fence, gates, viewing panels, height and site protection into compliance with the approved construction-safety setup and maintaining it for the required duration.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the fence configuration on the inspection date match the approved/logistics plan?
- Was the cited opening or defect temporary and promptly corrected?
- Was a permit or construction-fence filing active where required?
Evidence that may matter
- Approved construction-fence/site logistics documents
- Dated photographs
- Contractor logs and correction invoice
- Permit/filing record
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39558111Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED THE CONSTRUCTION FENCE INSTALLED AT THE SITE CONSISTED OF JERSEY BARRIERS WITH CHAIN-LINK FENCING, RATHER THAN THE SOLID WOOD-PANEL FENCING REQUIRED BY THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION
Cited provision(s): 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review