What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 8 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 6 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses. The hearing dates are October 21, 2026, October 28, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 13, 2026, August 19, 2026, August 24, 2026, July 30, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557321M
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: MATERIAL DELIVERY OPERATIONS USING KNUCKLE BOOM AT EXPO#1 CONTRARY TO DOT STIPULATIONS PERMIT# B69 USING MORE THAN 8' OF ROADWAY. CONCRETE OPERATIONS AT EXPO# 3 FULLY
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557324H
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONCRETE OPERATIONS AT EXPO# 3 CONTRACTOR FAILURE TO PERFORM PROPER CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER PROCEDURES AT EXPOSURE# 1. CONCRETE WASTE SCATTERED ON ROADWAY, CREATING AN UNSAFE AND
Cited provision(s): 2F1 — BC 3303.15 FAIL TO PERFORM PROPER CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER PROCEDURES AT SITE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557322Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: MATERIAL DELIVERY OPERATIONS USING KNUCKLE BOOM AT EXPO#1 AND CONCRETE OPERATIONS AT EXPO# 3 INADEQUATE STAGE WORK ZONE, PLASTIC BARRIERS SYSTEM CONTRARY TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFIC
Cited provision(s): 1N4
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557323X
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BACKFLOW PREVENTION. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, I OBSERVED FIRE HYDRANT BEING USED, HOSE CONNECTED GOING TO CONSTRUCTION SITE WITHOUT A BACKFLOW PREVENTER VALVE CONTRARY TO BC 15 RCNY 20-04. FAILURE TO PROVIDE
Cited provision(s): 206 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557896N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONTRACTOR PREPARING TO RECEIVE MATERIAL DELIVERY OPERATIONS USING KNUCKLE BOOM AT EXPO#3 FULLY BLOCKING SIDEWALK UPON REQUEST FOR DOT PERMIT, NONE WAS PROVIDED CREAT
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557897P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: SIDEWALK SHED/OVERHEAD PROTECTION AT EXPOSURE 1 NO MIRRORS AT LOCATIONS WHERE PEDESTRIANS VIEW IS OBSTRUCTED BY COLUMNS AT SIDEWALK AREA CONTRARY TO BC 3307.2.6 NUMERAL 3 VEHICLE
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558252M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 24, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONTRACTOR POURING CONCRETE AT 5TH FL. DECK LEVEL AT 8:25 AM APPROX. CONTRARY TO DOT PERMIT# B64 STIPULATION 072 AND PERMIT# B68 STIPULATION 072 AS WELL, CREATING UNS
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558116H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: UNSAFE MATERIAL DELIVERY. SCAFFOLD EQUIPMENT BEEN UNLOAD FROM TRUCK AND STORAGE ON TOP OF SIDEWALK SHED, CREATING UNSAFE CONDITIONS FOR PUBLIC AND PROPERTY, USING SCAFFOLD CONTRA
Cited provision(s): 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 8 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review