What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 4 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 4, 2026, July 28, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557168P
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 INSTALLED CONTRARY TO CODE. 8FT MIN HEIGHT REQUIREMENT NOT MAINTAINED INFRONT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY AT EXPOS 2 CONTRARY TO CODE 3307.6.4.7. DRIVEW
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557169R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED NOT MAINTAINED AND BEING USED IN SAFE CONDITION CONTRARY TO CODE 3307.6.5.1 SAFE CONDITION. MULTIPLE ROTTED MUDSILLS. LARGE ROLLING GATE UNSAFELY ATTACHED TO SHED CREATING A POTENTIAL
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557166L
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION OF A NON-ACTIVE 4 STORY ALT CONSTRUCTION SITE I OBSERVED A FENCE INSTALLED AT EXPOSURE 1 THAT DID NOT FULLY ENCLOSE ON GOING CONSTRUCTION WORK AND POTENTIAL HAZARDS CONTRARY TO CODE 3307.7 FENCE
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39199107Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE 1 OF CONSTRUCTION SITE, FULLY ERECTED SIDEWALK SHED UNDER APPLICATION#B00981725 EXP DATE 07/02/2026. NOV ISSUED FOR EXPIRED TEMPORARY EQUIPMENT., RENEW PERMIT; RENEW PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 207 — BC 105.8.2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON SITE-EXPIRED PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review