What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Work Without a Permit summonses; 2 Stop Work Order summonses; Failure to Maintain; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing dates are October 21, 2026, October 28, 2026, October 5, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 12, 2026, August 19, 2026, August 5, 2026, June 17, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39192966K
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 17, 2026; hearing October 5, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS. AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION SITE UNDER GC PERMIT #B01238059. INADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION SITE. NOTED AN E
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39192968Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 17, 2026; hearing October 5, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO SAFEGUARD PUBLIC AND PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. ATOI, OBSERVED CONSTR. SITE UNDER PERMIT #B01238059. NOTED AT EXP 3 LOOSE MATERIALS, WOOD PLANKS, 2X4, METAL STUDS, AND TRACKS STORE
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39199379H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED AT THE ROOF OF A 4 BUILDING NEWLY CREATED BULKHEAD AND PARAPET WALL AROUND THE ROOF PERIMETER. ALSO OBSERVED METAL PAN STAIRS INSTALLED BETWEEN 4TH FLOOR AND ROOF. ACCORDING TO DOB APPROVED DRAWIN
Cited provision(s): 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Stop Work Order — Summons 39200243Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ON THE ROOF OF THE PROPERTY CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION ON THE UNPERMITTED BULKHEAD CONSISTING OF ADDING A METAL FRAME TO THE DOOR OPENING AND PLASTERING EXTERIOR. ACCORDING TO DO
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39200249P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED ELECTRICAL WORK IN PROGRESS WITH THE INSTALLATION OF APPROX. 6 DISCONNECT BOXES ON ROOF LEVEL OF PROPERTY SUPPLYING ELECTRICITY TO AC CONDENSER UNITS WITH EXPOSED ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS AND EQUIPME
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Stop Work Order — Summons 39201037H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED CONTINUANCE OF WORK ONTO THE UNPERMITTED BULKHEAD AND PARAPET WALL AROUND THE ROOF PERIMETER. BOTH PARAPET WALL AND STRUCTURE IS NOW ENCASED WITH STUCCO AND A METAL DOOR IS ADDED ONTO THE STRUCTUR
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review