What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Demolition summonses. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 17, 2026, August 5, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Demolition — Summons 39557575M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: ADMIT/IN-VIO
DOB allegation in the source extract: ON-SITE FOR DEMO SIGN-OFF APPOINTMENT WITH C.S. AND P.M. OF A 2-STORY BUILDING. BUILDING IS DEMOLISHED WITH FULL BACKFILL OF CLEAN MASONRY DEBRIS. UPON RESEARCH THROUGH DOB NOW SYSTEM, NOTIFICATION WAS NOT PROV
Cited provision(s): 116 — BC 3306.3,27-195 FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED NOTIFICATION PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Demolition — Summons 39558013P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: ADMIT/IN-VIO
DOB allegation in the source extract: ON-SITE FOR DEMO SIGN-OFF APPOINTMENT WITH C.S BUILDING. OBSERVED BUILDING FULLY DEMOLISHED, BACKFILLED TO GRADE AS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS FINAL CONDITION. UPON RESEARCH, NOTIFICATION WAS NOT PROVIDED TO THE D
Cited provision(s): 116 — BC 3306.3,27-195 FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED NOTIFICATION PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review