What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Crane / Hoist / Derricks summonses. The hearing date is October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 7, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39199702Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: SUPERINTENDENT SHRAGE MAYER # 27850 FAILED TO NOTIFY DOB THAT ARTICULATING BOOM CRANE WAS BEING OPERATED BY PERSON WITHOUT NYC DOB HOIST MACHINE OPERATOR LICENSE. ITS SUPERINTENDENTS DUTY TO ENSURE THAT ANYONE
Cited provision(s): 1G4 — BC 3301.13.10 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DEPARTMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39199718N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: KNUCKLE BOOM CRANE WAS USED BY OWNER GC NY, LLC ON SITE HOISTING MATERIAL WITH SLING WRAPPED OVER ITS FORK. MEMBERS OF THE RIGGING CREW WERE NOT CERTIFIED, THE OPERATOR OF THE CRANE HAD NO HMO LICENSE., DISCONT
Cited provision(s): 142 — BC 3316.2 & BC 3319.1 INADEQUATE SAFETY MEASURES: OPERATION OF CRANE/ DERRICK/HOISTING EQUIP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review