What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Illegal Occupancy / Conversion; Work Without a Permit; Plumbing / Gas; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing date is October 6, 2026; the source issue date(s) are September 10, 2025, September 4, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Illegal Occupancy / Conversion — Summons 39159270H
CLASS - 2 · Issued September 4, 2025; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: OCCUPANCY CONTRARY TO THAT ALLOWED BY THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT RECORDS. AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED AT CELLAR LEVEL, CONVERTED TO LIVING SPACE WITH COUCH ,TV, IRON ., DISCONTINU
Cited provision(s): 203 — 28-118.3.2 OCC CONTRARY TO THAT ALLOWED BY THE C OF O OR DOB RECORDS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The key question is whether the observed occupancy or layout matches the lawful use of the premises. Resolution may require restoring the prior lawful layout/use or, when legally feasible, filing plans and obtaining approvals to legalize the condition.
Hearing issues to verify
- What use and number of dwelling/occupancy units are shown by the Certificate of Occupancy, Schedule of Occupancy or other lawful-use records?
- Did the inspector accurately identify how the space was being used on the cited date?
- Was the cited space actually occupied as alleged, or were the observed beds, kitchens, locks or partitions consistent with another lawful use?
- Is there an approved filing or historical record supporting the present use?
Evidence that may matter
- Certificate of Occupancy / Schedule of Occupancy and approved plans
- Historic occupancy records, permits and prior approved layouts
- Dated photographs and floor plans
- Leases, tenant records or sworn statements concerning actual use
- Permits/inspection records if the condition was legalized or restored
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39159271J
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 4, 2025; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT. AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED FINISHED BASEMENT AND 1ST FLOOR WITH ELECTRICAL WORK COMPLETED. CM#3877369 DISPOSITION NO ACTIVE ELECTRICAL PERMIT AND NO ELECTRICAL WORK ALLOWED
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 39159842Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued September 10, 2025; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO CONDUCT OR FILE A FINAL INSPECTION OF PERMITTED WORK WITH THE DEPARTMENT. JOB B00644983 PLUMBING WORK AT 1ST FLOOR AND CELLAR., CONDUCT/FILE FINAL INSPECTION
Cited provision(s): 2G1 — 28-116.2.4.2 FAIL TO CONDUCT/FILE A FINAL INSPECTION OF PERMITTED WORK WITH THE DEP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39159843X
CLASS - 2 · Issued September 10, 2025; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO CONDUCT OR FILE A FINAL INSPECTION OF PERMITTED WORK WITH THE DEPARTMENT. JOB B00644954 (PERMIT REVOKED INTERIOR RENO OF 1ST FLOOR AND CELLAR DUPLEX), CONDUCT/FILE FINAL INSPECTION
Cited provision(s): 2G1 — 28-116.2.4.2 FAIL TO CONDUCT/FILE A FINAL INSPECTION OF PERMITTED WORK WITH THE DEP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review