What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Sign / Awning / Advertising. The hearing date is October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 11, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557785K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 WITH A WOOD PARAPET INSTALLED CONTRARY TO CODE 3307.6.4.6 PARAPET. PARAPET SHALL CONSIST OF GALVANIZED WIRE SCREEN NOT LESS THAN NO. 16 STEEL WIRE
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557781N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A FENCE INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 NOT CONSTRUCTED OR MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO CODE. FENCE NOT MAINTAINED IN SOUND CONDITION. GRAFFITI ON FENCE (NOT FULLY PAINTED HUNTER GREEN). INADEQUATE V
Cited provision(s): 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sign / Awning / Advertising — Summons 39557783R
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A FENCE INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 WITH NO "NO SMOKING" SIGN INSTALLED ON IT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE NEW YORK CITY FIRE CODE CONTRARY TO CODE 3303.7.3 SMOKING.NO SMOKING SI
Cited provision(s): 2A9 — BC 3303.7.3 FAILURE TO POST NO SMOKING SIGNS AT CONST/DEMO SITE PER FIRE CODE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Sign-related charges usually require confirming zoning/permit requirements, dimensions, illumination and placement, followed by permit/legalization or removal/modification.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the sign/awning exempt from a permit or already covered by an approved filing?
- Were the dimensions/location described by the inspector accurate?
- Was the sign removed or modified before the summons date or hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Sign permit / zoning documents
- Measured photographs and drawings
- Removal or modification invoice
- Prior approvals and storefront plans
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review