What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Egress / Exit Obstruction summonses; Façade / Exterior Wall. The hearing date is October 28, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39201182Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOL,OBSERVED A 4 STORY MULTIPLE DWELLING WITH WALK-UP APARTMENTS.AT THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS DISCHARGING TO THE STREET,AN OBSTRUCTING GATE WAS EQUIPPED WITH PROHIBITED DOOR HARDWARE CONSISTING OF A KEY-LOC
Cited provision(s): 126 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: USE OF PROHIBIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39201180K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOL,OBSERVED A 4 STORY MULTIPLE DWELLING WITH WALK-UP APARTMENTS.THE EXISTING CURB AT THE SIDE/REAR OF THE PROPERTY WAS ALTERED BY INFILLING/MODIFYING THE ROADWAY AREA WHERE THE NORMAL RAISED CURB EXISTED.CREA
Cited provision(s): 204 — 28-302.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG WALL(S) OR APPURTENANCES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39201181M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOL,OBSERVED A 4 STORY MULTIPLE DWELLING WITH WALK-UP APARTMENTS.AT THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS A DOOR LEADING FROM THE 1ST FLOOR INTO THECOURTYARD AND ALONG THE CONNECTING INTERIOR EGRESS TRAVEL PATH,WAS EQU
Cited provision(s): 126 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: USE OF PROHIBIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review