What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Failure to Maintain summonses. The hearing date is October 26, 2026; the source issue date(s) are April 14, 2021, July 15, 2021, June 4, 2021.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 35560657H
CLASS - 1 · Issued April 14, 2021; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. NOTED: AT EXP#2 RETAINING WALL/STAIRS IN DISREPAIR/DETERIORATING W/CRACKS,MISSING/LOOSE SECTIONS OF CONCRETE/BLOCK. REMEDY: REPAIR &/OR REPLACE.
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 35561477P
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 4, 2021; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. NOTED: OBSERVED AT EXP#2 RETAINING WALL & STAIRS ARE DETERIORATED & BRICKS ARE BROKEN MISSING LOOSE MORTAR IN DIFFERENT SECTIONS ETC. REMEDY: REPAIRS &/OR REPL
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 35584253H
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 15, 2021; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. NOTED: AT EXP#2 RETAINING WALL & STAIRS ARE IN DISREPAIR DETERIORATING W/BROKEN/MISSING &LOOSE BRICKS/MORTAR & CRACKS THROUGHOUT IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS. PREVIOUS
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review