What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 7 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 4 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold. The hearing date is October 14, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 4, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557512P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED WORKERS INSTALLING DECKING ON THE 9 FLOOR AND STRIPPING THE 8 FLOOR AND THERE WERE NO HORIZONTAL SAFETY NETTING PROVIDED TO PREVENT DEBRIS FROM
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557515K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED ON THE 4 AND 5 FLOORS WORKER STANDING ON A BUCKET AND 2 OTHERS USING "A" FRAME LADDERS LEANING AGAINST WALL AND STANDING BACKWARDS NOT MAINTAIN
Cited provision(s): 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557513R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #4 SUPPORTED PIPE SCAFFOLD ON TOP OF SIDEWALK SHED OF ADJACENT BUILDING, UPON REQUEST FOR SITE SAFETY PLAN TO REFLECT SITE CONDITIO
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557516M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.1 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #1 ON STREET DELIVERY TRUCKS OCCUPYING ROAD WAY AND FLAGGERS DIRECTING TRAFFIC, UPON REQUEST FOR THERE FLAGGER CERTIFIC
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557511N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED ACTIVE JOBSITE AT 9 FLOOR DECKING LEVEL, UPON REQUEST FOR SITE SAFETY PLANS TO SHOW SUPER STRUCTURE NONE WAS PRESENTED OR AT JOBSITE, FAILURE T
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557514Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3301.2 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED ON THE 9TH FLOOR DECKING LOTS OF REBAR ON DECK THAT HAVE NO CAPS AND WITHOUT COVERS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN REBAR CAPS CREAT
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557517Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.1 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #1 ON STREET CONCRETE WASHOUT BOX, UPON REVIEW OF THE DOT PERMIT IT REQUIRES FOR FENCE AND BARRIERS THAT WAS NOT MAINTA
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 7 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review