What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold. The hearing date is October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 18, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39542552H
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 18, 2025; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, ACTIVE JOBSITE OBSERVED WITH MISSING GUARDRAIL SYSTEM ALONG MULTIPLE UNENCLOSED PERIMETERS, INCLUDING ROOF LEVEL 4 STORIES UP. THIS IS A SERIOUS FALL HAZARD IN VIOLATION OF BC 3308.7, WHI
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39542553J
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 18, 2025; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, MULTIPLE TEMPORARY PLATFORMS WERE OBSERVED IN USE. NO DESIGN DRAWINGS WERE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST. THIS IS A VIOLATION OF BC 3301.6.5 AND 3301.2, AS UNDOCUMENTED PLATFORMS POSE SERIOUS STR
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39542554L
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 18, 2025; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED PVC PIPE USED TO SHIELD POWERLINES WITH NO SEPARATION FROM SIDEWALK SHED-POSING ELECTROCUTION AND FIRE HAZARDS. PER BC 3314.4.4.12, ONLY THE UTILITY MAY INSTALL PROTECTION WHEN R
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review