What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; 2 Construction Fence summonses; Vacate Order. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 21, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 6, 2026, July 28, 2026, March 11, 2026, March 2, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Construction Fence — Summons 39557160K
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONSTRUCTION FENCE IN PLACE AT EXPOSURE#1-4 UNDER PERMIT# B00542232-I1-FN UPON REVIEW DEPARTMENT RECORD IT APPEAR PERMIT EXPIRED ON 07/14/2021, CREATING AN UNSAFE CONDITION FOR P
Cited provision(s): 207 — BC 105.8.2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON SITE-EXPIRED PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Construction-fence charges generally require bringing the fence, gates, viewing panels, height and site protection into compliance with the approved construction-safety setup and maintaining it for the required duration.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the fence configuration on the inspection date match the approved/logistics plan?
- Was the cited opening or defect temporary and promptly corrected?
- Was a permit or construction-fence filing active where required?
Evidence that may matter
- Approved construction-fence/site logistics documents
- Dated photographs
- Contractor logs and correction invoice
- Permit/filing record
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557158L
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING COMPLAINT OBSERVED: SIDEWALK SHED/OHP IN PLACE. AT EXPOSURE# 1 SECTION OF PARAPET UNASSEMBLED DISCONNECTED IN RISK OF DISLODGEMENT ANY MOMENT DUE TO WINDY CONDITIONS, CONTRARY TO 3307.6.4.6 CREATING
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557159N
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: SIDEWALK SHED/OHP INSTALLED AT EXPO# 1-4 MISSING PROJECT INFORMATION PANEL CONTRARY TO BC 3301.9.2. CREATING UNSAFE CONDITIONS FOR PUBLIC AND OCCUPIED ADJOINING PROPERTIES, SAFET
Cited provision(s): 217 — BC 3301.9,27-10009(C) FAIL TO PROVIDE/POST SIGN(S) AT JB SITE PURSUANT TO SUBSEC
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Construction Fence — Summons 39551087X
CLASS - 2 · Issued March 2, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONSTRUCTION FENCE IN PLACE AT EXPOSURE#1 UNDER PERMIT# B00542232-I1-FN UPON REVIEW DEPARTMENT RECORD IT APPEAR PERMIT EXPIRED ON 07/14/2021, CREATING AN UNSAFE CONDITION FOR PUB
Cited provision(s): 207 — BC 105.8.2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON SITE-EXPIRED PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Construction-fence charges generally require bringing the fence, gates, viewing panels, height and site protection into compliance with the approved construction-safety setup and maintaining it for the required duration.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the fence configuration on the inspection date match the approved/logistics plan?
- Was the cited opening or defect temporary and promptly corrected?
- Was a permit or construction-fence filing active where required?
Evidence that may matter
- Approved construction-fence/site logistics documents
- Dated photographs
- Contractor logs and correction invoice
- Permit/filing record
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39551483H
CLASS - 2 · Issued March 11, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 3 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED IN PLACE AT EXPOSURE #1 AND 4, PARAPET PANEL LOOSE AND IN DANGER OF FALLING AT EXPOSURE #1, FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN SIDEWALK
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Vacate Order — Summons 39199538X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER FROM THE COMMISSIONER. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, I OBSERVED THE BASEMENT LEVEL OCCUPIED BY THE DOCTOR'S OFFICE WITH PATIENTS WHILE UNDER AN ACTIVE FULL VACATE ORDER ISSUED ON 6/7
Cited provision(s): 1F9 — 28-207.4 FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review