What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Façade / Exterior Wall; Fence / Height / Zoning; Zoning / Parking / Use. The hearing dates are October 21, 2026, October 28, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 20, 2026, August 5, 2026, July 21, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39197038K
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 21, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED A 4-STORY MIXED-USE BUILDING WITH MULTIPLE WINDOW A/C UNITS INSTALLED AT APARTMENTS ON THE 3RD-FL. RIGHT AND 2ND-FL. LEFT FRONT WINDOWS AT EXPOSE 1, ABOVE THE FRONT YARD RIGHT & LEFT SIDES OF THE
Cited provision(s): 204 — 28-302.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG WALL(S) OR APPURTENANCES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Fence / Height / Zoning — Summons 39199212X
CLASS - 3 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FENCE EXCEEDS PERMITTED HEIGHT. NOTED AT A 4-STORY MULTI-DWELLING OBSERVED A REAR YARD FENCE AT EXPOSURE 2 APPROX. 9 FEET 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT WHICH EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED HEIGHT., CONFORM FENCE TO HEIGHT REQUIREM
Cited provision(s): 307 — 27-509,BC 3111.1 FENCE EXCEEDS PERMITTED HEIGHT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path depends on fence height, location, zoning and property type. The owner may need to reduce/remove the fence or document that it complies with the applicable permitted height/setback requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the height measured from the correct grade and at the cited location?
- Do zoning or approved plans allow the fence as installed?
- Was the cited fence temporary construction fencing rather than a permanent zoning fence?
Evidence that may matter
- Survey and field measurements
- Zoning map / approved plans
- Photographs showing height and location
- Permit or prior approval if applicable
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39201301H
CLASS - 3 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: PLANTING INSUFFICIENT. NOTED: AT A 4-STORY MULTI DWELLING OBSERVED ENTIRE FRONT YARD PAVED IN CONCRETE. OBSERVED NO PLANTING WHICH IS REQUIRED IN AN R7A ZONE.; ZR-MISC, COMPLY WITH ZONING RESOLUTION
Cited provision(s): 384 — ZR-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING RESOLUTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review