What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Crane / Hoist / Derricks; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Stop Work Order. The hearing date is October 28, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558167H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3301.1.2 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 6 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED AT THE 1ST FLOOR LEVEL ONE OXYGEN AND ACETYLENE TIED WITH ROPE AND HOSE EXTENDED TO THE TOP FLOOR, UPON REQUEST FOR FDNY PERMIT NON
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39558170Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.1 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 6 STORY NEW BUILDING AT THE 6 FLOOR LEVEL, I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #1 A LARGE CRANE PARK ON STREET, UPON REQUEST FOR DOT PERMIT NONE WAS PRESENTED OR AT JOBSITE, FAI
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558168J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.6 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 6 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #1 SIDEWALK SHED IN PLACE AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY WAS NOT MAINTAINING 5 FEET CLEAR WALKWAY UNDER THE SHED, FAILURE TO PR
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39558171K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 6 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #1, LARGE CRANE PARK ON STREET AND IT'S ARM HANGING OVER PARK CARS, APPROVED DRAWING REVEAL THAT NO VEHICLE SHOULD PARK UNDER CRANE
Cited provision(s): 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Stop Work Order — Summons 39558152P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED BUILDING AT 6 FLOOR LEVEL, 10 WORKERS AT JOBSITE, UPON REVIEW OF DOB RECORD IT REVEAL THAT A STOP WORK ORDER IS IN PLACE FOR THE ENTER JOBSITE ON 03-16-2026 COMPLAINT #
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558169L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 6 STORY NEW BUILDING AT THE 6 FLOOR LEVEL, I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #4 THAT THERE WERE NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY, FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN OVERHEAD PROT
Cited provision(s): 1P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review