What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Stop Work Order summonses; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 26, 2026; the source issue date(s) are April 29, 2025, May 1, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Stop Work Order — Summons 39146516X
CLASS - 1 · Issued April 29, 2025; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE ON NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER. ISSUED 04/23/2025 VIO-39145712Z. OBSERVED THE INSTALLATION OF A DOUBLE GLASS DOOR INSTALLED ON ILLEGALLY ERECTED BALCONY 2ND FLOOR OF EXPOSURE 2,
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39146724K
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 1, 2025; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NO SAFETY GUARDRAIL AT EXPOSURE #3, REAR OF BUILDING 2-FLOOR LEVEL, WHILE 2-MALE OCCUPANTS WORKING, AND WINDOW CONVERTED INTO NEW SMOOTH BLACK SLIDING DOOR AT EXPOSURE #2, AT NEW STEAL BALCONY. AT EXPOSURE #3,
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Stop Work Order — Summons 39146725M
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 1, 2025; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED 2-MALE OCCUPANT WORKING ON ILLEGAL 1ST FLOOR REAR ROOF, WITH NO SAFETY GUARDRAIL, WITH A FULL STOP WORK ORDER THAT EXIST. SEE COMPLAINT #3A10833 AND VIOLATION #39145709H, COMPLY WITH STOP WORK ORDER
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review