What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Work Without a Permit summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Failure to Maintain. The hearing dates are October 5, 2026, October 9, 2026; the source issue date(s) are June 4, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39149909K
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 4, 2025; hearing October 5, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED FULL INTERIOR RENOVATION. AT 2 STAIRCASES OBSERVED NO TEMP HANDRAILS OR GAURDRAILS AT OPENING. POTENTIAL FOR FALL AND SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH., PROVIDE GUARD RAILS
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39149911J
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 4, 2025; hearing October 5, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED APPROX 6 YARDS OF DEBRIS IN THE CELLAR. CONSISTING OF COMBUSTIBLE WOOD, 20 BLACK BAGS. PIPES, WIRES ETC. ALSO AT REAR DOOR STOVE, PIPES AND OTHER METAL ITEMS, REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39149912L
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 4, 2025; hearing October 5, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED A FULL INTERIOR RENOVATION. OBSERVED NEW ELECTRIC THROUGHOUT HOUSE. 40 PLUS LED PUCK LIGHTS, MULTIPLE NEW SWITCHES, OUTLETS. NEW WIRING AT TWO ELECTRIC PANELS. NEW BX CABLES RUN THROUGHOUT., OBTAI
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39149908Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 4, 2025; hearing October 9, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED FULL INTERIOR RENOVATION CONSISTING OF NEW WALLS, PLY SUBFLOOR, DRYWALL THROUGHOUT. ALSO OBSERVED 1 KITCHEN MAKING THIS A 1 FAMILY HOUSE., OBTAIN PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39149910H
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 4, 2025; hearing October 9, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED FULL INTERIOR RENOVATION WITH NEW PLUMBING THROUGHOUT, TUBS, SHOWER BODIES, TOILET ROUGHS, COPPER PIPING AND CAST IRON PIPING IN CELLAR. ALSO NEW GAS LINES RUN FROM THE METERS. NEW PEX TUBING FOR
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review