What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 8 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 4 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Sign / Awning / Advertising. The hearing dates are October 13, 2026, October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are January 9, 2026, June 26, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39549013K
CLASS - 2 · Issued January 9, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION REQUESTED CONSTRUCTION SUPER LOGS WERE NOT MAINTAIN ON SITE AS REQUIRED. ALSO CS FAILED TO APPOINT A COMPETENT PERSON WHILE THE SUPER IS ABSENT FROM SITE. CS WAS UNABLE TO DEMONSTRATE ACTI
Cited provision(s): 2G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39549015Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued January 9, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED THAT NO CONSTRUCTION FENCE WAS INSTALLED ALONG EXP 1 OF THE SITE, AS REQUIRED TO SAFEGUARD THE PUBLIC AND SECURE THE SITE. THE ABSENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FENCE LEFT THE SITE OPEN AND ACCESSIBLE FROM THE P
Cited provision(s): 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39549020Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued January 9, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE FAILED TO HAVE A REQUIRED SITE SAFETY PLAN AND NO DAILY LOGS ON SITE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW. UPON REQUEST NO DOCUMENTS WERE AVAILABLE CONTRARY TO BUILDING CODE. STOP ALL
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39549022M
CLASS - 1 · Issued January 9, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE FAILED TO PROVIDE A REQUIRED SIDEWALK SHED ALONG EXP 1. ABSENCE OF THE SIDEWALK SHED EXPOSES PEDESTRIANS TO IMMINENT DANGER FROM POTENTIAL F
Cited provision(s): 131 — BC 3307.3.1,27-102(A) FAILURE TO PROVIDE SIDEWALK SHED WHERE REQUIRED
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39549025H
CLASS - 2 · Issued January 9, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE ADJOINING PROPERTY @ THE CORNER OF EXP 2 & 3. OBSERVED THE BACKYARD TO ADJOINING PROPERTY ( 1164 47 STREET) EXPOSED FROM POSSIBLE FALLING DEBRIS
Cited provision(s): 2P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sign / Awning / Advertising — Summons 39549038R
CLASS - 2 · Issued January 9, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE FAILED TO HAVE REQUIRED DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR THE INSTALLED TEMPORARY STAIRSON THE INTERIOR OF EXP 4 FROM THE 1ST FLOOR TO ROOF. PROVIDE REQUIRED
Cited provision(s): 206 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Sign-related charges usually require confirming zoning/permit requirements, dimensions, illumination and placement, followed by permit/legalization or removal/modification.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the sign/awning exempt from a permit or already covered by an approved filing?
- Were the dimensions/location described by the inspector accurate?
- Was the sign removed or modified before the summons date or hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Sign permit / zoning documents
- Measured photographs and drawings
- Removal or modification invoice
- Prior approvals and storefront plans
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39549039Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued January 9, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION SHANTY ON THE BASEMENT OF THE SITE WAS NOT CONSTRUCTED OF FIRE RATED MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. THIS SHANTY LACKED THE REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, CREATING POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD
Cited provision(s): 206 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39541713P
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 26, 2025; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 2 STORY BUILDING UNDER ALTERATION , I OBSERVED THERE WERE NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION PROVIDED AT EXPOSURE 2 ADJACENT PROPERTY SHARED WALK WAY TO PROTECT THE OCCUPANTS ENTERING OR E
Cited provision(s): 2P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 8 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review