What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Façade / Exterior Wall summonses; Work Without a Permit; Other Building / Code Compliance; Stop Work Order. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 12, 2026, August 6, 2026, August 7, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557680Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INCIDENT FOLLOW UP INSPECTION, SHORING AND SUPPORT WORK WAS IN PROGRESS FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY EXTERIOR WALL AT EXP 4 OF THE JOB SITE AND EXPOSURE 2 OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. SHORING BEAMS OBSERVE
Cited provision(s): 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35721664K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE PROTECTION IF ADJOINING PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLOTION AS REQUIRED. AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED DAMAGE AT ADJACENT BUILDING(145555 STREET) DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. AS PER
Cited provision(s): 1P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39557682H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF FOLLOW UP INSPECTION REGARDING AN INCIDENT RESULTING IN DAMAGE AND CRACKING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY EXTERIOR WALL, TEMPORARY SHORING AND SUPPORTING EQUIPMENT WAS OBSERVED INSTALLED TO STABILIZE THE
Cited provision(s): 1G4 — BC 3301.13.10 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DEPARTMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39557679R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF FOLLOW UP INSPECTION REGARDING AN INCIDENT RESULTING IN DAMAGE AND CRACKING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY EXTERIOR WALL, TEMPORARY SHORING AND SUPPORTING EQUIPMENT WAS OBSERVED INSTALLED TO STABILIZE THE
Cited provision(s): 192 — BC 3301.8 FAILURE TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF AN ACCIDENT AT CONSTRU
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Stop Work Order — Summons 39557864Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED THAT THE SHORING SYSTEM HAD BEEN FURTHER UPDATED WITH ADDITIONAL STEEL MEMBERS AND CONNECTIONS, CONTRARY TO THE STOP WORK ORDER ISSUED ON 08/06/2026 UNDER COMPLAINT NO. 3A748
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review