What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Work Without a Permit summonses; Demolition; Stop Work Order. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 5, 2026, June 22, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Demolition — Summons 39193294L
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 22, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED FROM THE EXTERIOR AT EXPOSURE 4 THAT THERE WAS A FAILURE TO MAINTAIN, WITH A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THE DEMOLITION OF THE STAIRS., REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39193296P
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 22, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI,AT 11:40 AM, OBSERVED FROM THE EXTERIOR THAT ONE (1) SPLIT AC UNIT WAS INSTALLED AT EXPOSURE 2 AND ONE (1) SPLIT AC UNIT WAS INSTALLED AT EXPOSURE 4. NO PERMITS WERE OBSERVED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THESE
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39193295N
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 22, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI,OBSERVED FROM THE EXTERIOR AT EXPOSURE 4 THAT CONSTRUCTION WORK HAD BEEN PERFORMED. THE STAIRS LEADING TO THE TWO DOORS HAD BEEN REMOVED, AND ONE OF THE DOORS HAD BEEN INFILLED WITH BRICKS. NO PERMITS WERE
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Stop Work Order — Summons 39199218R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED FROM EXTERIOR THAT THE PSWO WAS REMOVED FROM THE FRONT DOOR. THE PSWO ISSUED FOR VIOLATION #039193295N FOR CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHOUT PERMIT AND WAS POSTED ON JUNE 22, 2026, AT 1:00 P.M., COMPLY W
Cited provision(s): 1F8 — 28-207.2.5 TAMPERED WITH, REMOVED OR DEFACED A WRITTEN STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review