What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; 2 Work Without a Permit summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 3, 2026, July 19, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557414L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: A WORKER TRANSPORTED TO THE HOSPITAL AFTER SUSTAINING A LACERATION TO THE HAND WHILE USING A SKIL SAW. PERMIT HOLDER, JOB NO.B01363906-I1-GC, FAILED TO SUBMIT REPORT WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS OF REQUIRED 16 ITEMS
Cited provision(s): 1M7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39196683Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 19, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED ELECTRIC WORK PREFORMED NOT BY A QUALIFED ELECTRICIAN WITH ELECTRIC PANELS OPEN/EXPOSED TO WORKERS, WIRES NOT PROPERLY GROUNDED, AND ELECTRIC CONNECTIONS EXPOSED, AND UNSAFE. WORK CREATED A DANGER OF FIRE
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39196686Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 19, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED WORK TO EXPAND CELLAR UNDER NEW BUILDING HORIZONTAL EXTENTION AT REAR. WORK WAS DONE WITHOUT PERMIT. SOE PERMIT B01363906-S1 TO ADD CELLAR EXTENTION TO EXISTING APPROVED ALTERARION B01363906 WAS OBJECTED
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39196682R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 19, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED JOBSITE FOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ENLARGENT HAD LARGE AMOUNTS OF DEBRIS AT EXTERIOR ND IN JOBSITE MAKING AREA UNSAFE. DEBRIS BLOCKS SHARED DRIVE AND IS LEANING AGAINST PROPERTY ON EXP 4 SIDE. PILED DEBR
Cited provision(s): 1N5
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39196684K
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 19, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED 8 WORKERS PREFORMING FRAMING PLUMBING, AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION. UPON REQUEST NO PLANS WERE ON SITE TO VERIFY WORK BEING CONDUCTED. NOTED UNSAFE CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT SITE WERE 1 WORKERS WAS SEVERELY INJU
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39196685M
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 19, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED SKIL SAW THAT SERIOUSLY INJURED ON WORKER WAS BEING USED CONTRARY TO MANUFACTURES SPECS. WORKER FAILED TO SECURE ITEM BEING CUT, WORE LOOSE FITTING MATERIAL (FABIRC NOTED LODGED IN BLADE), AND CUT ITEM IN
Cited provision(s): 1N4
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review