What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Stop Work Order summonses; 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 28, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 18, 2026, August 3, 2026, July 27, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Stop Work Order — Summons 39197764P
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 27, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE ON NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER. AT EXPO 1(FRONT) 1ST FLOOR EXTERIOR FACADE ILLEGAL WORK CONTINUED AFTER SWO 7/17/2026 WAS ISSUED OBSERVED 2 WORKERS WITH TOOLS WORK IN PROGRESS ON
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39198783P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: VIOLATION ISSUED FOR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN SAFETY MEASURES NO GUARDRAIL AND HANDRAIL SYSTEM . ATOI OBSERVED ON THE EXTEROIR PORCH AT EXPO # 1 AND THE STAIRCASE AT EXPO # 2 NO GUARDRAIL AND HAND RAIL SYSTEM . WHIC
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Stop Work Order — Summons 39200938K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED ONGOING CONSTRUCTION WORK ON THE SECOND-FLOOR BALCONY AT EXPOSURE #3, DESPITE AN ACTIVE SWO., COMPLY WITH STOP WORK ORDER
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39200939M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, ALSO OBSERVED THAT NO GUARDRAILS WERE IN PLACE AT THE SECOND-FLOOR BALCONY WHILE WORKERS WERE PERFORMING WORK INSIDE THE BALCONY., PROVIDE GUARD RAILS
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200946K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED EXCESSIVE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE, IN THE BACKYARD, AND INSIDE THE HOUSE, CREATING AN UNSAFE CONDITION., REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review