What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Crane / Hoist / Derricks; Sign / Awning / Advertising. The hearing date is October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 10, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39199894M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: KNUCKLE BOOM (FASSI SN#38050028) USED BY BUILDERS JOSEPEH AND SONS, GC-617198 WAS SET UP UNSAFELY ON SITE. OUTRIGGERS WERE SET ON EDGE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION WITH SIGNS OF CRACKING APPARENT & HALFWAY OFF DUNNAG
Cited provision(s): 142 — BC 3316.2 & BC 3319.1 INADEQUATE SAFETY MEASURES: OPERATION OF CRANE/ DERRICK/HOISTING EQUIP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Sign / Awning / Advertising — Summons 39199861X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: KNUCKLE BOOM (FASSI SN#38050028) OWNED BY CMC STUDS & STEEL LIFTING SERVICES WAS SET UP UNSAFELY ON SITE. OUTRIGGERS WERE SET ON EDGE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL WITH SIGN OF CRACKING APPARENT & HALF WAY OFF DU
Cited provision(s): 142 — BC 3316.2 & BC 3319.1 INADEQUATE SAFETY MEASURES: OPERATION OF CRANE/ DERRICK/HOISTING EQUIP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Sign-related charges usually require confirming zoning/permit requirements, dimensions, illumination and placement, followed by permit/legalization or removal/modification.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the sign/awning exempt from a permit or already covered by an approved filing?
- Were the dimensions/location described by the inspector accurate?
- Was the sign removed or modified before the summons date or hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Sign permit / zoning documents
- Measured photographs and drawings
- Removal or modification invoice
- Prior approvals and storefront plans
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review