What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Work Without a Permit summonses; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Failure to Maintain; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing date is October 14, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 28, 2026, July 29, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39198218M
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ECB VIOLATION ISSUED FOR UNSAFE UNSUBTLE ELECTRICAL WIRING IN USE: ATOI OBSERVED ON THE SECOND FLOOR MULTIPLE ELECTRICAL BX WIRING HANGING FROM THE CEILING DOWN TO THE FLOOR WHILE ACTIVE WORK WAS ONGOING. THIS
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39198221N
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED: ECB VIOLATION ISSUED FOR FTM ADEQUATE HOUSE KEEPING DUE TO EXCESSIVE DEBRIS. ATOI OBSERVED ON AN ACTIVE SITE AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS PILED UP ON THE THIRD FLOOR . CONSISTING OF A PILES
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39198219Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: PSWO ISSUED FOR FTM : ATOI OBSERVED SUPPORTED PIPE SCAFFOLD IN PLACE WITH A TARP WRAPPED AROUND IT WHICH IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING CODE (BC3314.1 / BC 3314.8) POSES AN UNSAFE CONDITION HIGH WINDS,
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39198222P
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: WORK WITHOUT PERMIT. PSWO ISSUED FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WORK BEING DONE ON THE INTERIOR OF THE RESIDENT. ATOI OBSERVED AT 11 AM IN INTERIOR ON THE 2ND FLOOR ACTIVE ELECTRICAL WORK TAKING PLACE CONSISTING OF INSTALL
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39198031M
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: WORK WITHOUT PERMIT: PSWO ISSUED FOR ALL GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CARPENTRY, STRUCTURAL, WORK BEING DONE ON THE RESIDENT. ATOI OBSERVED MULTIPLE ONE STORY WOOD FRAME HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL EXTENSION ON THE 1ST AND
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39198220L
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: VIOLATION ISSUED FOR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN SAFETY MEASURES NO GUARDRAIL . ATOI OBSERVED ON THE THIRD FLOOR OF THE RESIDENT NO GUARDRAIL SYSTEM AT EXPO # 2 DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION . WHICH IS A FALL HAZARD FOR A
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review