What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold. The hearing date is October 28, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 19, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39558138Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: AT CORNER EXPO# 3/4, THERE IS NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES DEMOLITION AT SECOND FLOOR LEVEL, WALL COLLAPSED, BRICKS AT REAR BACK YARD OF ADJACENT OCCUPIED BUIL
Cited provision(s): 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558139K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO A COMPLAINT OBSERVED: MISSING CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT REAR SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. BECOMING AN UNSAFE AND HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOR ADJOINING OCCUPIED BUILDING GETTING EASY ACCESS AND RESULTING SERIOUSL
Cited provision(s): 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39558137R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: GC FAILURE TO SAFEGUARD PUBLIC AND ADJACENT OCCUPIED PROPERTY, NO MEANS OF PROTECTION, AT EXPOSURE# 3 WALL PARTIALLY COLLAPSE BRAKING APART FENCE AND VERIZON UTILITIES. . STOP AL
Cited provision(s): 1P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review