What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 9 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 6 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Elevator / Vertical Transportation; Work Without a Permit. The hearing dates are October 14, 2026, October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 16, 2026, August 4, 2026, August 5, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557560J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT SCAFFOLD MATERIAL FELL ON WORKER, INVESTIGATION REVEAL THAT WORKERS TOOK PIPE SCAFFOLD FROM THE 9 FLOOR TO THE 1ST FLOOR TO LOADED ON TRUCK, INADEQUATE MATERIALS HANDLING AND STORAGE R
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557571P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC3307.4.7 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED ON STREET AT EXPOSURE #1 ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK SHED LOTS OF PLYWOOD, SHEETROCK, DUMPSTER COMPACTER TRUCK, DELIVERY TRUCK, THERE WERE NO 4FT SOLID BARRIER FROM
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557534X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT SCAFFOLD MATERIAL FELL ON WORKERS, INVESTIGATION REVEAL THAT WORKERS TOOK PIPE SCAFFOLD FROM THE 9 FLOOR TO 1ST FLOOR TO STOCK UNTO TRUCK, INADEQUATE MATERIALS HANDLING AND STORAGE RES
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557568Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3310.4 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION 15 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED ACTIVE JOBSITE WITH ALL TRADES, UPON REQUEST FOR SITE SAFETY MANAGER AND SITE SAFETY PLAN NONE WAS PRESENTED OR AT JOBSITE, FAILURE TO PROVID
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557535H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT SCAFFOLD MATERIAL FELL ON WORKERS, INVESTIGATION REVEAL THAT WORKERS TOOK PIPE SCAFFOLD FROM THE 9 FLOOR TO 1ST FLOOR TO STOCK UNTO TRUCK, INADEQUATE MATERIALS HANDLING AND STORAGE RES
Cited provision(s): 1J4 — BC 3301.11.1 AND 2 PERMIT HOLDER FAILED TO ENSURE WORKERS RECEIVE SITE SAFETY ORIENTATION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557569X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC3307.4.7 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED ON STREET AT EXPOSURE #1 ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK SHED LOTS OF PLYWOOD, SHEETROCK, DUMPSTER COMPACTER TRUCK, DELIVERY TRUCK, THERE WERE NO 4FT SOLID BARRIER FROM
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39557570N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED ELEVATORS IS IN USED TO TRANSPORT MATERIALS AND WORKERS TO THE 9,10,11 FLOORS, UPON REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE TO USED NONE WAS PRESENTED OR POSTED INSIDE OF ELEV
Cited provision(s): 179 — AC 1RCNY-MISC,RS-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557982J
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED AT EXP# 1 2 3. AT EXP# 2 3 OBSERVED EXCESSIVE MATERIAL STORED ON TOP OF SIDEWALK SHED CONTRARY TO APPROVED PLANS. STOP ALL STORAGE OF MATERIAL AND USE OF S
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557983L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED NOT MAINTAINED AS PER CODE. OBSERVED SAT EXP# 3 SHED PARAPET PANEL BROKEN / DETACHED. STOP ALL USE OF SIDEWALK SHED DECK MAINTAIN SWS AS PER CODE.
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 9 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review