What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 4 Vacate Order summonses; 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses. The hearing dates are October 26, 2026, October 27, 2026; the source issue date(s) are April 17, 2025, July 12, 2024, July 17, 2025, June 5, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 35693825R
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 5, 2025; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT, MEASURES OR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION. DAMAGED PLANKIN/DECKING AS NOTED: I OBSERVED ON SIDEWALKSHED DECKING:-ROTTED PLANKS, ON SIDEWALK SHED ON EXPOSURE #3 EAST ELEV
Cited provision(s): 1P6
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 35693826Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 5, 2025; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS. ASNOTED: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED ON SIDEWALK SHED AT THE EAST ELEVATION(ELDERT ELEVATION EXPOSURE #3: LARGE AMOUNT OF DEBRIS NOT
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Vacate Order — Summons 35716999X
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 5, 2025; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A VACATE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER'S ORDER. AS NOTED: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION I OBSERVED OCCUPANTS ON BALCONY AT EXPOSURE #3 EAST ELEVATION ON THE 2ND FLOOR. WITH A VA
Cited provision(s): 1F9 — 28-207.4 FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Vacate Order — Summons 35685574L
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 12, 2024; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER FROM THE COMMISSIONER PER 28-207.4 NOTE: RESPONDENT FAILURE TO COMPLY VACATE ORDER; ECB VIOL #35435628X(35435628X). AT TIME OF INSPECTION, I OBSERVED TENANT(A PERSON) STANDING IN
Cited provision(s): 1F9 — 28-207.4 FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Vacate Order — Summons 35690090L
CLASS - 1 · Issued April 17, 2025; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFULS ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH VACATE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER. NOTE AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED MULTIPLE PEOPLE AND KIDS ON VARIOUS DIFFERENT BALCONIES THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO BE VACATED. REMEDY: COMP
Cited provision(s): 1F9 — 28-207.4 FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Vacate Order — Summons 35718232J
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 17, 2025; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFUL ACTS.FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A VACATE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER.NOTE:AT TIME OF INSPECTION ON A 17 FL RESIDENTIAL BLDG WITH AN EXISTING VACATE ORDER ON BALCONIES AND A PREVIOUS BLF9 SUMMONS#35716999X DA
Cited provision(s): 1F9 — 28-207.4 FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review