What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Other Building / Code Compliance; Work Without a Permit; Plumbing / Gas. The hearing dates are October 21, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 13, 2026, July 21, 2026, July 29, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557245J
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: @7STORY NEW MAJOR BUILDING SITE W/CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT RAFAEL FERNANDEZ CS#029162 ON JOB RECORD,UPON REVIEW THE SUPER LOG IT WAS REVEALED RAFAEL HAD BEEN PERFORMING DUTY WHILE ON ADDITIONAL JOBS@308 14 S
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39196895K
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 21, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: THE R-VALUE OF THE INSTALLED EXTERIOR WALLS OUTBOARD INSULATION AT EXPOSURE # 2 AND #4 IS R-VALUE 10 WITH THICKNESS 2" CONTRARY WITH THE APPROVED DOB EN DRAWING AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING THAT INDICATE R-VALUE 1
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 35730881L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE SPECIAL INSPECTION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT TR1. AS NOTED AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE JOBSITE, PROPOSED 7 STORY NEW BUILDING, AT 3RD FLOOR LEVEL; I OBSERVED THERE WAS NO TR1 SPECIAL A
Cited provision(s): 285 — §28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. EXHAUST DISCH
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review