What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 5 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold. The hearing dates are October 21, 2026, October 28, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 16, 2026, August 19, 2026, August 21, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557965H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 28 STORY NB INACTIVE JOBSITE, WITH A BUILDING FOOTPRINT, (SQ. FT.)132329 WALK PERIMETERS, KNOCK & CALLED OUT, I OBSERVED NO COMPETENT WATCH PERSONNEL AS PER BC 3303.7.7.6 A WATCHPERSON REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557966J
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 330.1.1.3 I OBSERVED YODOCK SYSTEM IN PLACE WITH MISSING INTERLOCKING COUPLERS THROUGHOUT, AND NOT FILL WITH WATER/SAND WHICH POSES A POTENTIAL HAZARD BY ALLOWING UNINTENDED MOVEMENT OF THE BARRIERS INCREAS
Cited provision(s): 2F6 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557964X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3308.6.1.4 28-STORY NEW BUILDING, PROTECTIVE SCAFFOLD AT EXP# 1 WAS OBSERVED INCOMPLETE, WITH A SECTION APPROXIMATELY 4 FLOORS BELOW THE WORKING DECK. THIS CONDITION CREATES A HAZARD TO PUBLIC AND PROPERTY.
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557967L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2 AT INSPECTION OF A 28-STORY NEW BUILDING, A CONCRETE WASHOUT BOX WAS OBSERVED IN A STORAGE ZONE AT EXP#1, WITH FENCING MISSING AND UNRESTRICTED PUBLIC ACCESS. THIS CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITION TO PUB
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558200K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF AN 15RCNY 20-04 28-STORY NEW BUILDING AND ACTIVE JOB SITE, A FIRE HYDRANT WAS OBSERVED IN USE WITHOUT BACKFLOW PREVENTION. THIS CONDITION POSES A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
Cited provision(s): 179 — AC 1RCNY-MISC,RS-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558134L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 28, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 28-STORY NEW BUILDING, DEBRIS WAS OBSERVED THROUGHOUT THE SITE, INCLUDING THE 26TH, 27TH, AND 28TH FLOORS. THIS CONDITION CREATES A HAZARD TO WORKERS, THE PUBLIC, AND PROPERTY,
Cited provision(s): 212 — BC 3303.4,27-1018 FAIL TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HSEKEEPING PER SECTIONS REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review