What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Work Without a Permit; Failure to Maintain; Sign / Awning / Advertising. The hearing dates are October 21, 2026, October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 16, 2026, March 12, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557987Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 12-STORY NB, ACTIVE FORMWORK/REBAR OPERATIONS WERE OBSERVED ABOVE AN ACTIVE GAS STATION WITHOUT OHP OR A CONTROLLED ACCESS ZONE. A DELIVERY TRUCK AND PERSONNEL WERE DIRECTLY BELOW THE WORK AREA, CREATING A HAZA
Cited provision(s): 1P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557990J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.4.7 12-STORY NB, A CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS STORED ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK WITHOUT FENCING AT STORAGE ZONE AT EXP#1, WITH FENCING MISSING 4 FEET SALAD AND MESH ON TOP AND UNRESTRICTED PUBLIC ACCESS. THIS
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557988K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 12-STORY NB, ACTIVE WORK WAS OBSERVED AT EXP#2 ABOVE AN ACTIVE GAS STATION. THE APPROVED SITE SAFETY PLAN REQUIRES A 20-FT CONTROLLED ACCESS ZONE; NONE WAS IN PLACE. THIS CREATES A HAZARD TO PUBLIC/PROPERTY. ST
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39557989M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT INSPECTION OF A PROPOSED 12-STORY BUILDING, ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION WAS OBSERVED WITH MULTIPLE DEBRIS PILES THROUGHOUT THE SITE, CREATING A POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD AND UNSAFE CONDITION TO PUBLIC AND PROPERTY. STOP
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Sign / Awning / Advertising — Summons 35641097N
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 12, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 1817.6 DEFICIENT DRAWINGS-THE RESPONDENT REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL,FALLED TO MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF BC 1817.6,WHICH MANDATES THAT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR METHODS OF SUPPORT OF ADJACENT BUIL
Cited provision(s): 106 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Sign-related charges usually require confirming zoning/permit requirements, dimensions, illumination and placement, followed by permit/legalization or removal/modification.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the sign/awning exempt from a permit or already covered by an approved filing?
- Were the dimensions/location described by the inspector accurate?
- Was the sign removed or modified before the summons date or hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Sign permit / zoning documents
- Measured photographs and drawings
- Removal or modification invoice
- Prior approvals and storefront plans
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review