What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Demolition; Egress / Exit Obstruction. The hearing date is October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are March 4, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Demolition — Summons 39551257J
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 4, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 1 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED LARGE AMOUNT GARBAGE AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS INSIDE OF BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 6 TO 7 FEET IN HEIGHT. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKE
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39551258L
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 4, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 1 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED ON TOP OF ROOF THAT THERE WERE NO GUARDRAILS AROUND PERIMETER OF THE ROOF. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE GUARDRAILS CREATE A HAZARD FOR
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39551259N
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 4, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3303.9 AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 1 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED THAT THERE WERE NO INGRESS OR EGRESS TO ACCESS THE ROOF FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE INGRESS OR EGRESS TO ROOF CREATE A HAZAR
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39551260K
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 4, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 1 STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED 8 WORKERS ON JOBSITE, UPON REQUEST FOR SITE SAFETY ORIENTATION AND REFRESHER FROM THE COMPETENT PERSON, NONE WAS PRESENTED OR AT JOBSITE. FAILURE T
Cited provision(s): 1J6 — BC 3301.11.4 FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE REQUIRED INFORMATION DURING SITE SAFETY ORIENTA
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39551261M
CLASS - 2 · Issued March 4, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT THAT WORKER FELL FROM ROOF. INVESTIGATION REVEAL THAT WORKER WAS STANDING ON ROOF JOIST REMOVING SUB ROOF WHEN THE ROTTEN ROOF JOIST BROKE AND HE FELL TO
Cited provision(s): 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review