BuildingViolation.com

October 2026 NYC DOB / OATH Hearing — BIN 3430606

Brooklyn property record with 5 OATH/ECB summons records in the supplied October 2026 hearing extract. Hearing dates: October 1, 2026, October 14, 2026.

Need representation for this October hearing?

We can review the summons, agency record, correction status and available evidence; define the hearing strategy; prepare the authorized submission or appearance; and coordinate the underlying violation-resolution work separately where needed. Because hearing deadlines are fixed, substantive work begins after scope, authorization and payment.

Property / Hearing Identifiers

Primary hearing issue: Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold

BoroughBrooklyn
BIN3430606
Block / Lot03265 / 0042
October Records5
Official violation location: Loading from NYC OATH public records…
Address is resolved from the OATH Hearings Division Case Status record for OATH ticket 039548749Z (source ECB number 39548749Z). BIN and block/lot remain shown below for verification.

October 2026 Hearing Records

OATH/ECB #HearingSeverityHearing statusBalanceAlleged conditionCode / section
39548749Z
ACTIVE
October 1, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $2,500.00 BC 3307.2.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IN PLACE USING ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK. UPON REVIEW DEPARTMENT RECORD IT APPEAR; DOT PERMIT HAS NOT YET BEEN ISSUED, FOR OCCUPANCY OF ROADWAY AND 2P7
39557465L
ACTIVE
October 14, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $2,400.00 UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 BEING USED AND MAINTAINED IN A WAY THAT CREATES POTENTIAL HAZARDS TO THE PUBLIC CONTRARY TO CODE 3307.6.5.1 SAFE CONDITION. MULTIPLE UN PROTECTED 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
39557469Z
ACTIVE
October 14, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $2,500.00 UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED PIPE SCAFFOLD INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 AND 3 MAINTAINED AND USED IN A UNSAFE MANNER CONTRARY TO CODE 3314.1 . LOOSE AND DAMAGED SAFETY NETTING AT EXPOS 1&3. UNCLEARED WORKING DECKS (DEBRI 2P7
39557470X
ACTIVE
October 14, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $1,250.00 UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED CONTRARY TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS. NO DETAILS SHOWN FOR 6 OPENINGS INSTALLED IN SHED WHERE CROSS BRACING/HORIZONTAL BRACING HAS BEEN REMOVED AND HEADERS INST 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
39557445Y
ACTIVE
October 14, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 1 PENDING $2,500.00 PIPE SCAFFOLD INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1&3 CONTRARY TO APPROVED DRAWINGS AND UN SAFE. USE OF 3FT TALL & 2FT WIDE FRAMES NOT ON PLANS. HORIZONTAL PIPE CONNECTIONS ON THE 5TH FLR AND USE OF CONNECTIONS AT VARIOUS LOCAT 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV

What DOB is alleging at this property

This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; 2 Work Without a Permit summonses; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing dates are October 1, 2026, October 14, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 3, 2026, January 5, 2026.

Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.

Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39548749Z

CLASS - 2 · Issued January 5, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3307.2.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IN PLACE USING ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK. UPON REVIEW DEPARTMENT RECORD IT APPEAR; DOT PERMIT HAS NOT YET BEEN ISSUED, FOR OCCUPANCY OF ROADWAY AND

Cited provision(s): 2P7

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
  • Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
  • Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?

Evidence that may matter

  • Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
  • Dated photographs and videos
  • Permits, approved plans and inspection results
  • Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition

Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557465L

CLASS - 2 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 BEING USED AND MAINTAINED IN A WAY THAT CREATES POTENTIAL HAZARDS TO THE PUBLIC CONTRARY TO CODE 3307.6.5.1 SAFE CONDITION. MULTIPLE UN PROTECTED

Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
  • Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
  • Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?

Evidence that may matter

  • DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
  • Engineer/contractor inspection logs
  • Dated site photographs
  • Renewal or removal records

Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557469Z

CLASS - 2 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED PIPE SCAFFOLD INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 AND 3 MAINTAINED AND USED IN A UNSAFE MANNER CONTRARY TO CODE 3314.1 . LOOSE AND DAMAGED SAFETY NETTING AT EXPOS 1&3. UNCLEARED WORKING DECKS (DEBRI

Cited provision(s): 2P7

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
  • Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
  • Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?

Evidence that may matter

  • DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
  • Engineer/contractor inspection logs
  • Dated site photographs
  • Renewal or removal records

Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557470X

CLASS - 2 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED CONTRARY TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS. NO DETAILS SHOWN FOR 6 OPENINGS INSTALLED IN SHED WHERE CROSS BRACING/HORIZONTAL BRACING HAS BEEN REMOVED AND HEADERS INST

Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
  • Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
  • Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
  • If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?

Evidence that may matter

  • Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
  • Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
  • Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
  • Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
  • Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized

Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557445Y

CLASS - 1 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 14, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: PIPE SCAFFOLD INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1&3 CONTRARY TO APPROVED DRAWINGS AND UN SAFE. USE OF 3FT TALL & 2FT WIDE FRAMES NOT ON PLANS. HORIZONTAL PIPE CONNECTIONS ON THE 5TH FLR AND USE OF CONNECTIONS AT VARIOUS LOCAT

Cited provision(s): 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
  • Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
  • Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
  • If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?

Evidence that may matter

  • Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
  • Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
  • Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
  • Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
  • Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized

Case-specific next step

For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.

Submit These Summonses for Review

What to do before the hearing

1. Verify the summons

Confirm the scheduled date, respondent, violation location, charges and current OATH status.

2. Preserve evidence

Gather permits, photographs, contracts, inspection records, professional letters and proof of correction that actually relate to the cited condition.

3. Separate hearing from correction

A hearing result and physical/agency correction are not always the same task. Plan both tracks where required.

Official Hearing Record

Verify the current hearing status and violation location in the NYC OATH Hearings Division Case Status data before relying on any public directory.

NYC OATH Case Status Data →

OATH evidence and DOB correction records

OATH advises respondents to bring or submit the evidence needed to prove their case, including legal or official records, photographs, documents and witnesses. For a DOB Certificate of Correction, DOB may require supporting material such as photographs, receipts, permits and inspection results in addition to the required correction information and applicable civil-penalty documentation.