What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Work Without a Permit; Crane / Hoist / Derricks. The hearing dates are October 23, 2026, October 5, 2026; the source issue date(s) are December 18, 2025, November 12, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39546889L
CLASS - 2 · Issued November 12, 2025; hearing October 5, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVATION: AT EXPOSURE#1 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION (FENCE) EQUIPMENT EXTENDING 5' UPON MY REVIEW DRAWING SHOW FENCE WITH 3'EXTENTION. VIO FORFENCE CONTRARY TO PLAN. WITHOUT D.O.T PERMIT. CONFORM TO PLAN & PROVID
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39548060Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued December 18, 2025; hearing October 23, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION AFTER REVIEWING DOCUMENT THE DISABILITY INSURRANCE SHOWED UP EXPIRED 12/12/2025 GC# 611328
Cited provision(s): 148 — 28-401.9 FAILURE TO FILE EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH WORKERS COMP, LAW AND/OR D
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39548061K
CLASS - 1 · Issued December 18, 2025; hearing October 23, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: LACK OF ACCESS TO SECOND DECK, NO REBA COVERS, NO FALL PROTECTION PROVIDED BY GC #611328
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39548062M
CLASS - 1 · Issued December 18, 2025; hearing October 23, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NO SITE SAFTEY DRAWING; NOT TOOL BOX TALK; NO ORENTATION; NO PRESHIFT; NO SIDEWALK SHEED CHECKLIST NO COLD FORM STEEL DRAWING; NO STRUCTUAL DRAWING; NO FENCE DRAWING;
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review