What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Zoning / Parking / Use summonses. The hearing date is October 13, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39199508P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: VIOLATION OF PARKING REGULATIONS IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. NOTED: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED KIA K4 WITH NY LICENSE PLATE # LVN 4772 PARKED AT FRONT YARD., CONFORM TO PARKING REGULATIONS
Cited provision(s): 283 — ZR 25-41 VIOLATION OF PARKING REGULATIONS IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39199507N
CLASS - 3 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: PLANTING REQUIREMENT AT FRONT YARD. NOTED: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED THE PLANTING AREA OF THE FRONT YARD WAS REMOVED & REPLACED WITH CONCRETE.; ZR 23-451, COMPLY WITH ZONING RESOLUTION
Cited provision(s): 384 — ZR-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING RESOLUTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review