What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Egress / Exit Obstruction; Elevator / Vertical Transportation; Façade / Exterior Wall. The hearing dates are October 13, 2026, October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 5, 2026, January 6, 2026, January 7, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39199338L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER FOR 39107361Z. OBSERVED AT THE 3RD FLOOR APARTMENT C14 ILLEGAL/PROHIBITED KEY LOCKING DEVICES TO TWO (2) BEDROOMS PREVENTING/OBSTRUCTING FIRE-EGRESS TO SAFE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39172713Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued January 6, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT ROOF LEVEL,AT LEFT SIDE,PARAPET WALL HAS SECTIONS WITH PATCHES OF CEMENT, ELEVATOR MOTOR ROOM MISSING STUCCO FINISH., REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39172868Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued January 7, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT REAR OF BUILDING, AT LEFT SIDE, STRESS CRACKS APPEAR BETWEEN WINDOWS AT ALL FLOORS OVER REAR COURTYARD, MAINTAIN EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL
Cited provision(s): 204 — 28-302.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG WALL(S) OR APPURTENANCES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review