What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses. The hearing date is October 2, 2026; the source issue date(s) are September 18, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39545071K
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 18, 2025; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION WHICH REVEALED THERE WERE NO GUARDRAILS PROVIDED AT EXPOSURE 1 ELEVATED DECK APPROXIMATELY 6 FEET 4 INCHES FROM GRADE CREATING A HAZARDOUS FALLING CONDITION.PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN GU
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39545072M
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 18, 2025; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: INSPECTION REVEALED THERE WERE NO TEMPORARY HANDRAIL PROVIDED AS REQUIRED ON STAIR AT EXPOSURE 1 CREATING A HAZARDOUS UNSAFE FALLING CONDITION.PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN HANDRAIL AS PER CODE SPECIFICATIONS
Cited provision(s): 120 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review