What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Demolition summonses. The hearing date is October 13, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 5, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Demolition — Summons 39557578H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: @ACTIVE SITE IN DEMOLITION PHASE OBSERVE ACCUMULATED LARGE PILE OF COMBUSTIBLE DEBRIS WITHIN SITE+NO FIRE EXTINGUISHER BC3303.7.2 ON SITE CREATING SEVERE FIRE HAZARD BC3303.4.4.3 EXCEPTIONS+3303.5.1, LOOSE DEBR
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Demolition — Summons 39557577X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: @PERMITTED ENLARGEMENT SITE OBSERVE SITE IN DEMOLITION PHASE WHERE EXISTING 2 STORIES HAS BEEN REMOVED DOWN TO FOUNDATION AND I CONFIRMED PER DOB RECORDS(DOB NOW)THE REQUIRED DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION WAS NOT MAD
Cited provision(s): 116 — BC 3306.3,27-195 FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED NOTIFICATION PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review