Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201313P
DOB allegation in the source extract: I OBSERVED AT TIME OF INSPECTION IN CELLAR LEAKING RPZ WHICH IS PROHIBITED BY NYC PC 102.3 WHICH STATES BOTH EXISTING AND NEW, AND PARTS THEREOF SHALL BE MAINTAIN IN A PROPER OPERATING CONDITION. DEVICES OR SAF
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records