What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing date is October 13, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557620M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: DURING INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE SITE AT EARTHWORK/EXCAVATION PHASE, DOB RECORDS REVEALED THAT THERE WAS NO NOTIFICATION MADE TO THE DEPT PRIOR TO THE START OF EARTHWORK WHICH IS REQUIRED BY CODE. NOTIFY DOB OF T
Cited provision(s): 111 — BC 3304.3,1 RCNY 52-01(A) FAIL TO NOTIFYDOB PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTHWORK
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557622X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: DURING INSPECTION OF A SITE AT SOE PHASE I OBSERVED SHORING AT EXPOSURE #4 AND INADEQUATE SLOPPING/STEPPING AT EXPOSURE#3 THE SHEAR WALL WAS OVER 6 FEET IN HEIGHT & INADEQUATELY SLOPPED. THE LACK OF PROPER SLOP
Cited provision(s): 110 — BC 3304.4,27-1032 FAIL TO PROVIDE PROTECTION AT SIDES OF EXCAVATION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557621Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: DURING INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE SITE AT EARTHWORK PHASE, I REQUESTED TO SEE THE SOE PLANS AND NONE WERE PROVIDED. THE WORKERS SAID THAT THE PLANS WERE NOT ONSITE. AS PER CODE ALL DOCUMENTS MUST BE ONSITE AND PRE
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review