What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Zoning / Parking / Use summonses; Fence / Height / Zoning; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 6, 2026; the source issue date(s) are May 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Fence / Height / Zoning — Summons 39187529X
CLASS - 3 · Issued May 6, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RCA ISSUED ON 12/14/24 BY BADGE#3255 TO SAME RESPONDENT & NOT CORRECTED FRONT FENCE EXCEEDS PERMITTED HEIGHT REQUIRED, FENCE POLES ARE APPROX. 6FT & FENCE 5FT, PER RESEARCH FENCE INSTALL AFTER 2008 BC & IS REQU
Cited provision(s): 307 — 27-509,BC 3111.1 FENCE EXCEEDS PERMITTED HEIGHT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path depends on fence height, location, zoning and property type. The owner may need to reduce/remove the fence or document that it complies with the applicable permitted height/setback requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the height measured from the correct grade and at the cited location?
- Do zoning or approved plans allow the fence as installed?
- Was the cited fence temporary construction fencing rather than a permanent zoning fence?
Evidence that may matter
- Survey and field measurements
- Zoning map / approved plans
- Photographs showing height and location
- Permit or prior approval if applicable
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39187530N
CLASS - 2 · Issued May 6, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RCA ISSUED 12/14/24 BY BADGE#3255 TO SAME RESPONDENT & NOT CORRECTED FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CURB CUT ILLEGALLY EXTENDED APPROX. 10 FEET WITHOUT DOB APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BC 3202.2.2.4 & DOT SPECIFICATIONS
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39187531P
CLASS - 2 · Issued May 6, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RCA ISSUED 12/14/24 BY BADGE#3255 TO SAME RESPONDENT & NOT CORRECTED VIOLATION OF PARKING REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT FRONT ADJACENT TO LEGAL DRIVEWAY 1 CAR ABUTTING PREMISES PARKED WHERE FRONT GRASS
Cited provision(s): 283 — ZR 25-41 VIOLATION OF PARKING REGULATIONS IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39187532R
CLASS - 2 · Issued May 6, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RCA ISSUED ON 12/14/24 TO SAME RESPONDENT & NOT CORRECTED FRONT YARD PLANTING AREA REMOVED VIOLATION OF SECTION ZR23-613 & CONCRETE PAVED TO USE AS AN ILLEGAL OFF STREET PARKING PAD W/CAR PARK NY PLATES LZB-149
Cited provision(s): 284 — ZR-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING RESOLUTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review